With my increased knowledge of toxicology from this section,
there are numerous questions that I would include in the histories of certain
patients that I had not previously considered. The location of a patient’s home
can be very telling in many ways. If the home is located next to certain areas
of high exposure, such as a freeway or fracking site, there may be clues to the
causes of particular symptoms. A patient presenting with asthma symptoms could
have numerous different exposures in the environment that need to be explored. Being
adjacent to a dry-cleaning facility could indicate that the patient receives
chronic exposure to perchlorethylene, especially if they live in an apartment located
above the facility. The location of a home will also offer clues to the age of
the home if the patient is unsure of when it was built. Older homes are
significantly more likely to contain some amount of lead paint, especially
those built before 1940. These homes may also contain some level of lead in the
pipes or lead solder used in plumbing. This could be crucial information to
collect when a patient presents with a condition like anemia. Educating
patients about these risks and encouraging them to be proactive by testing
their homes for lead, especially before performing any sort of renovation,
could significantly reduce dangerous levels of exposure. Patients that live in
more rural areas may receive their water via a well. It would be important to
gather this information and determine whether the patient may receive increased
exposure to radon. Have they ever had their home tested for radon?
I would also like to collect information regarding the
patient’s occupation and explore what types of toxic chemicals and substances
to which they could be at risk for exposure. Do they use materials that contain
latex, fragrances, or pesticides? Does their job require them to use cleaning
agents or paint? Do they use the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when
using these substances? I previously worked at an old military hospital that
still had asbestos in the insulation. During renovations, there were several
signs placed and very strict precautions and barriers set up to protect
workers. Also, in what types of hobbies does the patient participate? Some
hobbies involve materials and chemicals that could be potentially dangerous
without the proper protective equipment. I would explore if there are any
hobbies that involve glues, paints, fragrances, or lead-based substances, such
as soldering. I had never before flour as an asthma trigger, but it is now
clear how dangerous it can be as an airborne powder. Those working in the
food/baking industry likely have no idea of the risks of exposure.
A recent study published by Hahn et al., 2019 tested the effects of a personalized environmental report back intervention on change in stage of action for air nicotine testing and adopting a smoke-free home and radon testing and mitigation from baseline to 3 months post-intervention. The researchers sampled 515 home owners and 315 completed the 3-month follow-up placing them in randomized, two-arm parallel groups with stratified quota sampling. One group received free air nicotine and radon home testing kits and a brief telephone call to problem solve any concerns, and the other group received a coupon for the free tests. The homeowners who were provided with the free kits showed the greatest interest to take action on creating a smoke-free home over the group who received the coupons and standard public health information. Overall, both groups showed an increase in commitment to reduce the risks in their homes over time. The reason why this study is so important is because it requires buy-in and increased understanding to increase self-efficacy and by educating and arming the first group with the tools needed to do this, a greater chance of readiness was found. Other studies have confirmed that people spend more time indoors than outdoors, so more research needs to be done in the environments where life happens every day.
ReplyDeleteHahn, J., Huntington-Moskos, L., Mundy, M., Rademacher, K., Wiggins, A., Raydens, M., Studts, J., & Butler, K. (2019). A randomized trial to test personalized environmental report back to reduce lung cancer. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1), 165-175. DOI: 10.1177/1090198118788602